Our investigation of the human fossil record revealed a consistent pattern: well-documented endpoints separated by poorly documented transitions, mechanisms that fail under scrutiny, and reconstruction methods that employ circular reasoning. These problems appeared not once but systematically—across the 26 proposed ancestor species, Neanderthal classification, and the emergence of modern humans.
This raises a fundamental question: if we find such significant gaps and contradictions in the recent, relatively well-preserved fossil record, what does this mean for earlier evolutionary claims?
The logical next step is to examine the foundation itself—the origin of life. If the first living cell could not have arisen through natural processes, then subsequent questions about evolutionary transitions become secondary. Before evaluating whether life evolved, we must ask whether life could begin.
This investigation applies the same systematic approach: examining evidence, identifying gaps, questioning assumptions, and following logic wherever it leads—even if that challenges established narratives.